Yesterday, I happened to read an article by Dilip which made me go into the philosophical mode. I concur with Khalil when he says –
“Thought is a bird of space which in the cage of words can unfold its wings but cannot fly”.
but still instead of letting the conversations which I had with myself die down, I thought of penning them down.
Thought 1 –
Is it possible to live without a religion?
Thought 2 –
What is a religion?
- Till date, the world is struggling in finding out an appropriate definition of religion. But I believe a religion to be a set of thoughts, principles, facts and behavior which guides a person to overcome his fear of the unknown.
Thought 3 –
Why do people fear the unknown?
- Fear of the unknown can be used interchangeably with the fear of change.
Thought 4 –
Then why do people fear from change?
- No one fears change by birth. Rather a child is the best explorer. His sense of exploration is overcome by the feeling of fear by two things –
o When his explorations yield results in form of physical agony which for a child is a disincentive to further explore the source of his agony e.g. when child touches a heated press.
o Unknowingly parents would induce this fear within the child through punishments e.g. the child is scolded when he picks up a sharp tool like a razor or knife. Even though it might be for the good of the child; but a child is a very fast learner. When he finds no reward in exploring things like “the burning effect of fire”, “pain of a cut by knife” etc and instead is always garlanded with punishments, he gradually stops his exploits to please the ones who give him comfort – his parents. He starts depending on his parents for an art which they have long forgot – “Exploring the unknown”.
- As an individual starts depending on others to tell him what is good for him and what not - he starts fearing the change and the unknown whenever he has to face them by himself.
- Whenever needed, he would turn to someone for advice who has been introduced to him as an expert in that field.
- In the event of a lack of any expert (Guru), he turns to the set of thoughts, principles, facts and behaviors which someone spoke of at some point of time and which are now encapsulated in the form of a religion. These thoughts and principles act as a lighthouse for him not only for his day to day fears but also to his gravest fear – “Death”.
- We get introduced to a religion normally by our parents and peers. Some get chance to explore them and some don’t. But ironically, majority is formed by those who haven’t even explored the first religion they were introduced to. They simply rely on others to tell them that this religion is right so follow it.
Thought 5 –
This means that the purpose of every religion is the same?
- Yes.
Thought 6 –
Then, why so many religions?
- Years ago, someone must have sat down and done some kind of philosophical and psychological analysis and derived a few facts shortlisted a few principles to follow. Some of them we know; like Buddha, Mahavir and other learned men of their times. Sharing these analyses of theirs might have benefited quite a few men who shared them further. If you take a closer look into the history of most of the religions, you would find two common things across them –
o No two religions originated at the same place and around the same time period. Moreover, the same religion took time to spread in the region within the vicinity of its origin. The major factor can be attributed to the lack of the highly sophisticated communication network as the one we have today. (Man...., thats why I love this add).
o None of the people who are “Supposed” to have started a religion wrote down their analysis (which people term as preaching today); they merely shared it with others verbally. These analyses were merely based on empirical study and the validation was always in progress during their lifetime.
- As people slowly realized that these thoughts and principles are a panacea to all their worldly problems, they started following them in a dutiful manner. Herd mentality is not the problem of this century. It’s been there for long enough to get supporters for any new religion.
- Now as times were different, people (Preachers) were different, places were different and there was huge communication barrier in terms of geography - thoughts cannot be shared. This meant that someone with a set of analysis in India would not know that a similar analysis had been done in China by someone else. And hence religions kept on increasing.
- There is another reason too – As no one took the responsibility of the propagating the religion formally, it was a kind of mass movement which brought people together. History tells us that gradually as leaders, kings and politicians realized the power of these movements; they tried to use this power in their favor. This is how a religion started to corrupt and divide. The growing corruption made people loose faith in the movement they originally belonged to and started switching to the relative new ones which were relatively free from the evils. And thus the vicious circle just continued forever.
- The involvement of the powerful persons of that time in a particular religion, helped propogate it to far of places because of which some of them have survived e.g. Ashoka endorsed what Buddha had said, Constantine supported Jesus’ preaching, and Aryans supported what was written in Hinduism and so on. I am sure, there were more such religions started but being not endorsed by powerful men and due to the lack of enough masses behind it, they became extinct. Whatever religions we follow, see and hear of today are the ones which at some point in time found a mentor in the powerful men of their times.
Thought 7 –
But with the presence of the huge communication network, if you can share all your thoughts, ideas and principles with every living being-
Would this corruption go away?
Would people realize the real meaning of Religion?
Would the number of religions decrease?
Would there be no more new religion hereafter?
- This is quiet a troublesome question for me and I haven’t got any logical answer to even after pondering over it for quiet a long time. I believe the answer to the last question shall give me an answer to all the others. It is a very high probability that I might not get the answer in my lifetime if the answer has to be positive.
- But one thing I am sure of that Dilip might have got disillusioned by religions because of the corruption that crept in with time but I am sure that living without a religion is out of question (assuming my definition of religion)